In voir dire, cause challenges are best described as:

In voir dire, cause challenges are best described as:

• A. They can be unlimited in number
• B. They require a reason to strike
• C. They are never used
• D. They are identical to peremptory challenges

Answer: (A)

Cause challenges in voir dire are about removing jurors who cannot be unbiased. The key point is there is no fixed cap on how many jurors can be struck for cause; you can keep challenging jurors as long as there is a legitimate reason showing they cannot be impartial. Each strike must be supported by evidence of bias, relationship, or other disqualifying factors, and the judge decides whether the reason is sufficient. This unlimited nature sets cause challenges apart from peremptory challenges, which don’t require a reason and are limited in number. While you do need a valid justification to strike for cause, the defining feature you’re being tested on is that there isn’t a numeric limit to those challenges.

Cause challenges in voir dire are about removing jurors who cannot be unbiased. The key point is there is no fixed cap on how many jurors can be struck for cause; you can keep challenging jurors as long as there is a legitimate reason showing they cannot be impartial. Each strike must be supported by evidence of bias, relationship, or other disqualifying factors, and the judge decides whether the reason is sufficient. This unlimited nature sets cause challenges apart from peremptory challenges, which don’t require a reason and are limited in number. While you do need a valid justification to strike for cause, the defining feature you’re being tested on is that there isn’t a numeric limit to those challenges.